|
Printable version |
From: | "DR" <kat47@bigfoot.com> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:24:26 +1200 |
While the proposed taxing of owner occupied housing
is not politically a goer, there are good reasons for doing it and some options
available for allowing it to proceed in a way that does not affect a large part
of the voter base.
Perhaps a threshhold of relief (say the first
$100,000 of net value).
However, while I have not seen anything other than
what is in the newspaper, I would be inclined to tax every asset for notional
income at a lower rate. This would include second houses and vacant land, boats,
and even art works. After all the money used to buy them could have been more
usefully invested.
D.
|
Replies
|