|
Printable version |
From: | "Dannie Hawkins" <dannie@es.co.nz> |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:48:20 +1200 |
Hi
Re Mike G asset backing should
be related to assets - liabilities. The questions about CDLs NTA relate to the
value of the assets. The market is suggesting that they are overvalued in the
books. It may cost say $130,000 to build a hotel room, but if you only make a
net profit of say $300 on that room, is the value of the room still
$130,000?
To most investors it is the return on their
investment that counts.
It is worth noting that one of CDLs controlled
hotels ,the Millennium hotel in Sydney, was written down last year by
$23.6 million, despite making it's first real trading profit for goodness knows
how many years (due to the Olympics)
That said I own both CDL and Kingsgate. Kingsgate's
shopping centre looks like a real asset. They should have sold their apartments
by next year, at a profit, the sales should lower debt and interest costs. I am
still very dubious about their hotel though.
With CDL I am intrigued by the reported comments at
the AGM that the first quarter was good and the trend is continuing (or
something like that). If the group can make an extra $10 a room a day it will
almost all go on the bottom line. This would make the shares cheap (a PE of
about 4) and the book values a little closer to "market value"
NZ hotel rooms are very cheap compared to most
of the rest of the world. Last year CDL averaged about US$40 a room (not much
more than a Youth Hostel in London). There seems to be a bit of room for
"international" guests, in particular, to pay more..... If only we had more
international business travellers to NZ.
Hope this helps
Dannie
|
|