|
Printable version |
From: | "Breadmore, Malcolm" <BreadmoM@anz.com> |
Date: | Fri, 18 May 2001 10:25:54 +1000 |
Roy I agree with all your points, but remember you don't get something for nothing. Your points suggest that the baby boomers may decide to rent rather than own (which is logical), it still makes a great rental market for property investors. The property investor will not buy a property and rent it to a baby boomer if they don't get a reasonable return on their dollar (supply and demand). As a property investor, you do have to work out whether you are buying for capital gains or cash flow (or both). Most properties fall into one of the categories. The average ¾ bedroom home is not very good at the cash flow thing, but flats generally will be better. So when buying a ¾ bedroom home, one will look to the rent to cover the expenses of ownership. This is normally offset with a significant "tax break". This is one of the reasons it is more expensive to own your own home, because you cannot claim the expense against your income. The only money I put into my rental properties is payment on the principle amount of the loan, which directly increases my Net Worth. I would not buy if I had to pay any other expenses. So that being the case, at 100% finance I pay nothing, but reap the "small" capital gain each year (3-4%) on the banks money. If I buy well, and buy in a "growth area" where people want to live (like you Baby Boomers), then I can expect a better than average return on capital (5-10%). So the sums look like this: $200,000 3 bed home = $10,000 return at 5% capital gain per annum. My return on investment is great considering I have put down only the cost associated with the purchase (lawyer, valuation fees ~$1,500). So, I hope more people choose to rent like yourself and your friends. Regards Malcolm (disc own property......well the bank does) -----Original Message----- From: Roy [mailto:baldman@internet-auditor.com] Sent: Friday, 18 May 2001 12:13 To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz Subject: Re: RE: [sharechat] Residential property again Malcolm, Needless to say both you and Max have a point IMHO. Depends how you are looking at residential investment. Yes the 3/4 bedrooms will be excess to requirement for US BABY boomers. Yes lots of us will be selling. However most of my compatriots are not buying smaller but renting! Why do I (and they) rent? a) Its cheaper than owning (don't forget to take in the cost of capital, maintenance, rates & insurance) the later of course a deductible. b) No worries about maintenance etc etc (my rent even covers the Gardener!) c) If I want to go try living someplace else I have the flexibility to move in a very short time with no financial penalty. (ie no real estate agents fees etc etc) d) In a low inflation regime leverageing on a non income producing property is a nonsense.(ie I pay more in interest on the mortgage than rent on a house & get bugger all capital appreciation e) House construction produces more houses each year than is required (note net population figures of adult ie house owning population) f) By the way most of us rent a 3 bedroom house for the economics. Office/Hobby room plus something for guests/visitors/returning offspring etc. As you say an interesting discussion. PS By the way two friends who are well respected Financial Advisors have joined me in renting for many of the reasons above. Max Interesting theory, however.....you say "the percentage of the population over the age of 60 will double "....... from what 2% to 4%, 5% to 10%. This may not be as significant as you suggest. "the cash needs of an elderly population often make them 'motivated vendors'"..... I disagree. They haven't been saving all their lives to suddenly decide to sell in such a hurry as they sell under market value. "These cheap houses are also going to negatively impact the rental market as this is the market that will suddenly be able to purchase." So you say there will be a whole new group of purchasers out there...you can't have it both ways. Supply and demand will keep the prices up. A couple of other points to consider. People have to live somewhere. Whether we rent or own we all need roofs over our heads. The market will never change that fact. Housing will not disappear because some chartist or fundamentalist says "it's not a good buy". Immigration has been given the green light to increase by 60%. I read in the IT news that 10,000 new immigrates will be granted residency because the IT sector is under-supplied with skilled resource. Back in 1987 the NZSE 40 was over 4000, it is now only half that. I wonder what the return is on the average 3 bedroom home, if purchased back in 87. Food for thought Regards Malcolm "I Trade therefore I am" Zen Trader philosophy Roy ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
Replies
|