|
Printable version |
From: | Derek <dkw@paradise.net.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Mar 2001 21:15:20 +1200 |
Thanks Tony, Doesn't sound that bad really, the arguments with the other would-be apple exporters were pretty public and I wouldn't have thought that statement this would have had such a large effect on the Enza share price. (Although before GPG came along Enza was trading at current levels.) For the record I've underlined the bits I find _promising_. Rgds, Derek Enza: _So far_, less than satisfactory. _Prior_ to the appointment of the new Board, the company was in a worse position than previously known, with possible severe repercussions for New Zealand apple and pear growers. _GPG has contributed_ a disproportionate level of input relative to the absolute size of our investment (18% of the capital with a book value of 1.8 million) but which we accept, within reason, as our _contribution to the rescue_ of an important national industry. _Enza can become_ a large (Year 2000 sales of NZ$800 million) and successful organisation if industry politics embrace a greater sense of unity and commercial logic. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
Replies
|