|
Printable version |
From: | "G Stolwyk" <stolwyk@wave.co.nz> |
Date: | Fri, 29 Dec 2000 00:07:15 +1300 |
Hugh,
Is debt bad? I am
referring to companies where the ratio current assetts : current
liabilities can be close to 1.
H: It depends on the amount of cash flow being
generated and to what use it is put.
AIA tends to have a high
operating cash flow; it is about
1.5*E/S.
They feel that they can support term
borrowings of some $290 mill. As interest is deducted from income prior to
taxation, their use of capital is tax efficient.
Obviously, the return on the borrowed money
is higher than what they are paying in interest which is
adequately covered.
Being able to use this money speeds up development
of land. They own all real estate. Most of it is rented
out. Their web site < www.auckland-airport.co.nz
>
G: I was told that the just completed
'Warehouse' has the highest revenue per transaction!
I think that, given
time, AIA's property valuations must
rise!
H: The government of Singapore
knows AIA better than the NZ citizen. I feel that if
they were allowed to take it over now ( I hope not!
), then they would have to pay close to $4.50/share.
The shareprice should rise with
the rising flow of tourists. An increasing number are
NZders who travel to see their family in Australia and vice versa.
Singapore tends to have a long term outlook
and deep pockets!
I think that the current
share price should be close to
$3.30!
G: I can remember that when AIR NZ
had a monopoly, people travelling in this country were made to
pay exorbitant fares!
Many say they still do! Now the airline is moaning about the extra
fees they have to pay!!
H: Air NZ feels hard done by;
after all, Qantas hedged their fuel price and they
did'nt ! Sour
grapes?
Gerry
( Being a NZder, I am proud to
hold AIA! )
|
|