|
Printable version |
From: | Brian Gale <brigale@i4free.co.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 09 Oct 2000 10:31:25 +1300 |
Hello Mick Don't mind you butting in at all - that's what Sharechat is all about. As far as FFS is concerned IMO nothing has really changed, there have been constant rumours and counter-rumours and very large sales going through, but I still go by an earlier statement by Fletchers which mentioned a December date for finalisation. The whole market is down at present which is seasonal to a degree but is also attributable to a nervousness which is a hallmark of our marketplace, tending to create panic selling. Should pick up in the next month or so as bargains are apparent. FFS is a speculative share but the fundamentals are sound and I believe it is worthwhile as an investment irrespective of the "sale" question. I believe you are new to Sharechat - you might be interested to look through the archives with FFS as the search - you will find a whole host of info there which will give you a clue as to my post to Derek. Regards Brian (hold FFS) At 08:30 09-10-00 +1300, you wrote: >hi brian >i hope u don't mind me butting in? >i like talking to people who mention FFS. >where do u think FFS is going to go from here? >regards mick > >-----Original Message----- >From: Brian Gale [mailto:brigale@i4free.co.nz] >Sent: Saturday, 7 October 2000 09:37 >To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz >Subject: Re: [sharechat] FFS > > >Hi Derek > >Hope you're not loosing your faith in FFS, you were such a strong supporter >in the past. Lets see what happens when we get through Black October. > >Regards >Brian > >At 10:17 06-10-00 +1300, you wrote: > >Thanks for the post GPT, > > > >The last 2 days with FFS give yet another example of how small shareholders > >can get hit by not having the inside knowledge of others - a good argument > >for for small shareholders sticking to non-speculative investing I guess & > >maybe moving offshore (Does anyone know if overseas sharemarkets any better > >in this regard?). > > > >Also a brick-bat to Fletchers for keeping everyone in the dark. > > > >Cheers, > >Derek > > > > > > > > > > > >At 10:02 AM 06/10/00 +1300, you wrote: > > > my question posed yesterday is now apparent from the following >article > > >in the Herald. A placement would be the easier to arrange and must be > > >attractive to a US operator given the exchange rate. This would of >course > > >dilute the shareholding with NTA reducing from its current $1.69 to say > > >$1.25 or thereabouts. Still makes FFS an attractive proposition at >today's > > >prices. Look out for a rocky ride for a few days as the traders get out >at > > >any cost. GPT Fletcher Forest price drops as talks fail > > > > > >06.10.2000 - By GEOFF SENESCALL Fletcher Forests' share price was felled > > >yesterday amid speculation that the debt-laden company will undergo a > > >major recapitalisation after sale talks foundered. Fletcher has been in > > >negotiations with Citic, its Chinese joint venture partner in the >Central > > >North Island Forestry Partnership. But it is understood that the pair - >in > > >dispute over the partnership's management contract with Fletcher Forests >- > > >have been unable to patch up their differences. Fletcher is understood >to > > >have decided to pull the plug on discussions which included a sale to > > >Citic. However, Fletcher Challenge spokeswoman Ginny Radford would not > > >comment last night when asked if the deal was dead. A Citic spokesman > > >said earlier that no progress had been made, and it was moving to a >court > > >resolution. Fletcher Forests' share price yesterday tumbled 6c to 72c as > > >the market started talking about a possible rights issue. But an > > >alternative is for a placement of shares to a cornerstone shareholder. > > >Brokers estimated Fletcher Forests would need up to $300 million to shore > > >up its balance sheet. Resolving issues around Fletcher Forests is the >key > > >to the restructuring of the rest of the group, which includes Fletcher > > >Energy and Fletcher Building. Meanwhile, shareholders in Australian oil > > >explorer Petroz have rejected a proposal that would have handed control >of > > >the company to Fletcher Energy. A meeting of shareholders held yesterday > > >to seek approval for a Fletcher Energy proposal that would have seen it > > >take at least a 33.7 per cent stake in Petroz, and underwrite a rights > > >issue, overwhelmingly voted against it. > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >- > >http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market >investors > >http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join >now. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >- > >To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > >http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors >http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at >http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors >http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at >http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|