|
Printable version |
From: | Mike Nelson <bb2345@ihug.co.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 09 Oct 2000 09:09:05 +1300 |
Of the ones you mention I really like RMG and ITC and even ADV. You are correct about what would have happened if we had started a year ago with those but I can't see much more downside in these shares from here on in. MN At 06:21 AM 09-10-00 +1300, you wrote: > It would have to be decided whether to go for >the fundamental/buffet type portfoio (boring-like mine) > which would have to be held for years. > Or a more risky high reward approach. As we would >only be putting in 1000 each i would prefer the latter. > My only reservation would be that judging from the >posts on this group if we had started the portfolio a year ago >we would probably now hold AQL RMG ELD ADV and ITC all would of >been bought at >much higher prices than they are today. In short we would i suspect of >been crucified > > nick >> >> > I am a starter for a real portfolio with contributors kicking in a $1000 >> > (or more) each. Let's know. >> > >> > MN > >> > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors >http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at >http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|