Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - October 2000

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: Re: Re: [sharechat] Why Must Brash Go!


From: Mike Nelson <bb2345@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 01:06:46 +1300


Could you name some of these Governments David ?

MN


At 10:35 PM 07-10-00 +1300, you wrote:
>   Aye?  What has MMP got to do with the  argument? The Nats circa 1993/96
>were the most ineffectual  government that we have ever had. Not because of
>MMP but because they thought  they could run things in a FPP manner when
>those days had gone, and also because  their power lust got them into bed
>with a nutcase. They did not have the confidence or the  guts/integrity to
>try to run a minority government. This is not to say Lab would have done 
>better. MMP is a new concept and is only now starting to  settle. Just
>recognise that there are governments in Europe that run quite well  with
>MMP or an equivalent.   David Reid
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
http://www.netbroker.co.nz/        Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.

References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: [sharechat] The Hugh Webber Exchange-Rate Fallacy (WEF) RIL
Previous by Date: Re: Re: Re: Re: [sharechat] Why Must Brash Go! David Reid ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: Re: Re: Re: [sharechat] Why Must Brash Go! David Reid
Previous by Thread: Re: Re: Re: [sharechat] Why Must Brash Go! David Reid ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]