Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - June 2000

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] BRY


From: "Richard Hooper" <hoop@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 01:21:15 +1200


Data on this is hard to find (burn't all my old annual reports in disgust) ( before1999 any figure in annual report was ""instrinsic value"" a value priced by directors when market can't decide what true price is.
In hindsight laymen term for instrinsic value is bullshit value.
If I can recollect I think it was 1.70 sterling, not sure..... The bad news is that they (incl bry) have spent alot more on upgrading THO. The good news is that the upgrading is nearly completed and the cash flow is returning with interest . The bad news is that now the company is not an albatross around BRY neck anymore it want's to sell out at depressed prices (1.70) I understand (rumour)....Logic  ?????????
THO fell from 1.80 to 1.11 when it reported not as good a profit as investors had wished for ( unjust if I might say ) .It now seems to be trending upwards, at present 1.28 .It's natural price seems to be about 1.70 sterling once this negative feeling on the company disappears ( or BRY disappears). 
 
:)))))))
Hoop
  
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 8:21 AM
Subject: [sharechat] BRY

Does anyone know what is the per share price BRY paid for its stake in Thistle Hotel a few years ago?
 
RGDS,
 
Vincent Wang

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: Re: Re: Re: [sharechat] Beaty direct . Whats this announcement signify? Richard Hooper
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] Share list for gurgitating. :))))))) Richard Hooper ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] BRY Chong Family
Previous by Thread: Re: Re: Re: Re: [sharechat] Beaty direct . Whats this announcement signify? Richard Hooper ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]