Forum Archive Index - May 2000

["Rob Henderson" <robhenderson@paradise.net.nz>]

Mike - try reading between the lines a little . . . . .  are you inferring
that i was expressing confidence in AQL during this earlier post?

Really, you folks might consider spending your energy - not on 'shooting the
messenger' - but on looking at who has been responsible for the current
situation with AQL and what you intend to do about it, if as current
shareholders, you are concerned about how things have unfolded -

For the record - yeah, i did have a $ each way on AQL (don't bet on the
horses sorry Mike) because i thought with the overheated tech stock
speculation of the time AQL had little/no downside in the very short term
and potentially alot of upside if Watson exhaled - BUT i looked at it harder
after a couple of weeks and due to the actions of management issuing more
shares i got out (prior to this earlier post). Im only stating this to set
the record strait but i feel the next message will probably ask me for an
apology for making $500 on it !

PS - if it makes you guys feel any better i had some $ in a company in the
US that ran to $10 then got suspended from trading by the SEC for making
false press releases, got slapped with a class action lawsuit by
shareholders and reopened at .85c ! See David, it does "go around" as you so
graciously put it -


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.