Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - March 2000

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

[sharechat] Something for "Beauty Direct" hopefuls to digest


From: "Peter Robertson" <p.robertson@clear.net.nz>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:34:33 +1200


ChaosMusic suffers the scorn of doubtful investors
 
  17-Mar-2000
With the world-wide slump in business-to-consumer Internet stock prices, it is prudent for any e-investor out there to think seriously about where the money is going to be headed in the near future.

In the US there are approximately 400 publicly traded Web stocks, together worth something in the order of $1 trillion, or around 5% of the total capitalisation of all US stocks. Merrill Lynch's Henry Blodget said that Merrills estimates the value of pure-Internet stocks to rise to $2-$3 trillion over the next few years. However, they are also expecting a shakeout in the business-to-consumer Internet sector which should see market leaders such as Yahoo!, America Online and Amazon.com emerge stronger and leaner – and of course leave the bottom-to-mid end of the market remembering the good old days when valuations were based on the magnitude of your share price - “Really? 20 cents…gee that’s cheap. We had better buy some then!”

So what does this mean for a small music e-tailer like ChaosMusic?

It could possibly mean that the stock is placed in that dark spot in venture capitalist’s portfolios – the section of the venture capital portfolio where investors expect to see their investment go to zero.

ChaosMusic issued 16.6 million shares late last year at $1.40 through a book-build process. It opened on the ASX at $1.50 and hit a high of $1.57. Since then however, the stock price has failed to make any headway. It fell to a low of 71 cents, mid-last month but has since recovered to trade just above the $1.00 mark.

Over the six month period from July 1 to December 31 1999, the e-tailer recorded online revenues of approximately $1.2 million, up 757% from the previous six months, whilst membership numbers increased from 8,500 to about 31,700, or approximately 350%.

Whilst these percentage figures sound impressive, remember, we’re talking about a startup Internet retailer, with revenue figures that have nowhere to go but up. It’s not like they have no competition either…both from bricks-and-mortar retailers and other e-tailers such as sanity, estore, and a host of smaller Internet retailers which one can find easily with a few clicks of the mouse on Looksmart’s search engine.

And they’re just the local Aussie stores. What about the American and UK online music stores who are able to offer a wider selection of new music at roughly the same price even after postage is included? Not to mention the fact that all the online stores, not just Chaos, must be shaking with fear in anticipation of Coles Myer’s full-fledged entry into the online retailing fray.

It might be that ChaosMusic will be able to achieve its future strategy quickly and ensure itself an ongoing position on the bookmarks of many young Australians. In its prospectus, the group said that it was aiming to maintain chaosmusic.com as a leading Australian retail Website around which a network of specialist music Websites will be developed.

However, in the midst of growing concern about the valuations put on pure Internet b-to-c companies, it seems investors have become nervous about the prospects of ChaosMusic. Maybe it’s just a matter of time before…
 

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: [sharechat] PS to Willi - Networks John H T Wilkinson
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] network.vbs - Wild Goose Chase - It was!! John H T Wilkinson ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] SPE probably an excellent buy...I've just got out !! Tony Haddon
Previous by Thread: RE: [sharechat] PS to Willi - Networks Wilfried Roding ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]