|
Printable version |
From: | RIL <RIL99_99@yahoo.co.uk> |
Date: | Sun, 19 Mar 2000 23:30:35 +1200 |
Which economists disagree with most of that? And why is that of interest? I think my own way through issues. A proposition is valid or invalid independently of the proposer. The iterations have been in one direction in the last six months down (ie no iteration except around temporary equilibria). The issue to which I refered is the dominant issue. If you think a thing as complex as the purchasing power in an economy can be determined by the cost of junk food then we have problems. London is a lifestyle choice. Interesting people, great history, architecture, libraries, museums, plays etc. But I guess if you want to sit on a beach with a bunch of inarticulate beer guzzling morons who can't string a sentence together then NZ is your place. Personally if I never see the place again I'll be happy. For those of you who are thinking of leaving. There was a study done by some anthropologists. It involved a number of baboons in the wild. They found that when they pretended they were hunters and chased the baboons they ran until they came to the border of their known habitat. They then stopped, knowing they would be shot at and probably die. You see the fear of the unknown was worse than the known bullet. A few friends and I are in the process of setting up a web site to help other Kiwis get out. We will be posting information on different countries to move to and contacts once there (like a buddy system ti get them settled). So if you are skilled watch out for it. We're hoping to save a few thousand Kiwis a year. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.
Replies
|