|
Printable version |
From: | Nigel McCarter <n.mccarter@clear.net.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 14 Feb 2000 07:30:24 +1300 |
Hi everybody Just going back to the value versus trading debate, It is important to work out in advance, in real terms, what the costs benefits and expectations of any share investing strategy is. Have a look at the attched spreadsheet. The cells coloured rose (for rose coloured spectacles) can be altered to show differing sets of assumptions. The cells coloured grey are formulae that calculate net gains from dividends and capital gains. The cells coloured green are the results of the two strategies. For example, if you think you can make 35% capital gain per year after brokers fees trading shares put in 35. Good on you say I. I reckon I average about 20% per year plus dividends on buying and holding shares for the longer term, despite my current portfolio looking very sick. To beat this by trading, I have to make at least 35% average capital gain on all my stocks. Have a play with the assumptions and watch what happens with your holdings. Then factor in the probability of major volatility in either the trading portfolio or the buy and hold portfolio and see what happens. Cheers Nigel PS I'm sticking with value trading, cos I never seem to be able to buy trading shares before the boom.
Nigel McCarter Shorten the Odds The Short Portfolio Box 23 019 Hamilton Phone 64 7 858 2429 Fax 64 858 2689 Mobile 025 274 8560
References
|