|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Sat, 29 Jan 2000 16:48:30 +0000 |
> > Firstly, I strongly believe in the use of Index Funds as a basic > foundation of any investor with a long term view. > > In the last 10 years in the US 85% of Mutual Funds have under > performed their comparative Indexes. I have no reason to believe NZ > Mutual Funds have done any better > So why not invest in the 15% that outperform the index? NZ does have the ridiculous situation where Mutual Funds are taxed at a higher rate than private citizens and Index Funds which doesn't help. > > In general I am not a fan of actively managed Mutual Funds. They > generally have excessive entry and exit fees, > If they didn't have entry and exit fees they may be hijacked by day traders, which would reduce their appeal to the long term investor. > > hold large numbers of stocks (sometimes 1000s), > I 'have heard' that the S&P 500 index funds hold 500 stocks. It's of the same order. > > We always like to have a % of cash in reserve and if the "bubble" > burst we'll be in like a robbers dog. > Brierley in GPG has had the same thoughts and has been sitting on a mountain of cash for a while now. As a consequence teh GPG share price has gone nowhere of late. How much cash (in percentage of your total assets terms) do you think it is prudent to sit on? SNOOPY --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "You can tell me I'm wrong twice, but that still only makes me wrong once." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.
References
|