Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - October 1999

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] Question of required return


From: "Brent Wheeler" <brentw@bwcl.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 11:51:16 +1300


The Yahoo Finance site is good on this. Certainly for other country stocks
(and NZ's listed abroad) and I think down the left hand side of their site
is a list of sites you may have to delve into.  Some brokers periodically
produce them and we run our own too.  Certainly Bridge (ex Dow
Jones/Telerate has betas - but not free I fear!)  Word of warning, getting
into this area, which is what we swim in) involves a lot of considerations
about "asset betas versus leveraged betas" tax etc.  The 6% - 7% on top of
Rf often referred in US texts is NOT comparable to the NZ situation where
imputation applies (vs US tax deductability of interest to the company
rules). One for free, the (and our) current "post investor tax" cost of
equity estimate for the NZ mkt is 8% -9% - so mkt valuation roughly equals:

5% (Rf) + 1 (beta for mkt as a whole) * Rm (8.5% e.g.) = 13.5%

This could help or drive you nutty.

Dr Brent Wheeler
Director
Brent Wheeler & Co. Limited
AUCKLAND


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, email sharechat-request@sharechat.co.nz
with "unsubscribe" in the body of the message, or use the unsubscription
form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.

References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: [sharechat] Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 16:15:54 PDT ritchie marr
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] damn! need advice please Brent Wheeler ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: [sharechat] Question of required return Rini H
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] Question of required return Mark Hubbard ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]