Sharechat Logo

Lyttelton Port's mysterious capex policy

Friday 23rd July 2004

Text too small?
Companies that fail to return calls invariably set off alarm bells ­ especially for specific questions relating to financials.

NBR wanted to ask Lyttelton Port why it expected to increase capex spend to about $60 million above maintenance over the next five years without showing a material effect on future earnings.

Notwithstanding one-off items such as increased security obligations, the forecast had seemed excessive given the company's medium-to-long term guidance of generally flat earnings.

Although the company has experienced stronger-than-expected second half growth in volumes, its total earnings before interest and tax (ebit) are forecast to remain roughly the same through to 2006.

On current estimates, the company's capital expenditure of $19.4 million in 2003 would increase to $22.9 million for the next two years and to $23.4 million in 2006.

As a result net debt is forecast to balloon to $69.7 million in 2006, giving the port a gearing ratio of 124%.

If, as brokers expect, the company is now budgeting for less capex spend, why did the company indicate such a high figure in the first place?

Lyttelton Port is heavily engaged in long-running industrial relations disputes, which might explain why three attempts to contact the company's management were not returned.

The company is upgrading its facilities, a process that has already taken longer and cost more than expected.

Despite upgrading its full-year net profit forecast from $11.5 million to $12 million, there is still no tangible evidence of a significant turnaround in performance given the amount of capital going in.

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

Kiwi Property launches Green Bond offer
TEM - Transaction in Own Shares
December 2nd Morning Report
MWE - Intention to De-list from the NZX Main Board
KMD Brands announces Release of Climate-Related Disclosure
Rua Bioscience expands product range in New Zealand
SPG - HY25 Interim Results
PaySauce FY25 Half Year Result and Interim Report
Synlait releases Integrated Climate Report
KORELLA MINE ADVANTAGED BY COMPLETION OF MAJOR ROAD RESEAL