Sharechat Logo

High Court turns down airlines' bid to overturn appeal undertaking

Wednesday 16th November 2011

Text too small?

The High Court has turned down a bid by the eight airlines accused of fixing air cargo prices to appeal the first part of the antitrust regulator’s case, saying they must honour their pledge to wait until the second part of the trial before petitioning the Court of Appeal.  

The airlines had sought to be released from their pledge but the request was turned down by Judge Raynor Asher, according to a written decision on Nov. 3 that was published on the Justice Department’s website this week.

The airlines claimed their undertaking not to appeal the first part of the trial could be overturned as the date for the second part of the trial has been pushed out until 2013, giving the appeal process more time to proceed.

Judge Asher disagreed, saying “it would be positively unjust to grant the application” which would change an agreed concession and force the regulator to conduct the case on two fronts at the same time.

If two lots of appeals were granted, Judge Asher said the case could be dragged out by as much as three years and could finish as late as the middle of 2018.

“I am satisfied that the effect of the undertaking has been to make the divided trial process more speedy and inexpensive, in ensuring that if at least the commission was successful, there would only be one round of appeals,” the judgement said.

Air New Zealand, Japan Airlines International, Emirates, Malaysian Airlines System Berhad, Korean Airlines, Thai Airways International, Singapore Airlines & Singapore Airlines Cargo and Cathay Pacific had previously agreed to wait until judgement from the second stage of the trial before making an appeal to ensure all appeal issues were dealt with at once.

(BusinessDesk)

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

MPG - Metroglass clarifies media statements by Crescent Capital
VTL - Takeovers Panel orders Empire to reimburse Vital's expenses
March 14th Morning Report
SKT - Sky secures iconic sports rights
RYM - Ryman completes Retail Entitlement Offer
TEM - Transaction in Own Shares
FPH launches F&P Nova™ Nasal mask in NZ and AU
Fonterra announces changes to management team
March 12th Morning Report
WHS FY25 Interim Results teleconference details