Sharechat Logo

Report finds miners see a future. Now Canberra must step up.

www.newportconsulting.com.au

Tuesday 30th July 2013

Text too small?

Despite miners displaying a negative outlook for their prospects in 2013-14, every cloud has a silver lining, according to the latest Mining Business Outlook Report. The report suggests that the industry’s future could be sustained if miners focus on extracting more value from their current assets, and if the government provides a more supportive policy environment and greater commitment to national infrastructure.

On the one hand, the report confirms the sector’s apparent downturn. Close to half of the mining leaders interviewed are ‘not optimistic’ about their prospects, an increase of 34 per cent compared with just 7 per cent of miners voicing this outlook in 2010. Leaders are cutting jobs significantly to control costs, and are reducing CAPEX spend. The report warns that if this hold on investment continues, Australia will be reinforcing its status as less attractive as an investment destination. 

Miners’ key drivers for not spending included the uncertain economic environment (32 per cent), difficulty in getting development funding (30 per cent), and budget constraints (12 per cent). Volatile market conditions are the primary reason for a downbeat view, followed by falling demand (19 per cent) and lower commodity prices (12 per cent). 

While the report’s findings coincide with the general consensus that the investment phase of the mining boom has ended for now, it also reveals hopeful trends within the industry, as miners become increasingly attuned to control areas such as costs, productivity and operational efficiencies. The report also suggests that mining companies have a renewed awareness of the need for innovation, which could reinvigorate Australia’s mining, manufacturing and services sectors and be the catalyst for an industry-wide resurgence.

David Hand, Managing Director of Newport Consulting, says: “As miners have to postpone projects and future investment because of a poor investment outlook, they have an opportunity to extract maximum value from existing operations and assets through improved productivity. This is not a bad thing for the sector. If anything, a renewed focus on operational efficiencies could deliver healthier profits and shareholder value in the current difficult economic climate.”

The report revealed that, while productivity is on the agenda, an overwhelming 66 per cent of leaders reported a low level of productivity. Only 3 per cent of mining leaders were confident about achieving high levels of productivity within their operation. A further 8 per cent lacked the knowledge altogether on how to measure this indicator.

The report concludes with strong dissatisfaction among mining leaders with the government, particularly around union strength, inflexible IR regulations and poor national infrastructure. Meanwhile, although miners show some acceptance of meeting environmental regulations, they strongly feel that such requirements are adding costs to their businesses, and delaying operational and development plans and investment as a result.  They universally believe the MRRT is bad policy for Australia, even though the tax has generated very little tax revenue so far.

The report, conducted annually since 2010 by operational management consultancy Newport Consulting, canvasses the views of Australia’s mining leaders. It draws on in-depth interviews held between April and June 2013 with 60 mining executives from a broad range of private and publicly listed companies. This special election-year edition of the report features John Morschel, Chairman ANZ; Roy Green, Dean UTS Business School; and Brendan Cannon, Director, Firewall Logistics. The report serves as an independent pulse-check of Australia’s mining industry.




  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

FBU - Fletcher Building Announces Director Appointment
December 23rd Morning Report
MWE - Suspension of Trading and Delisting
EBOS welcomes finalisation of First PWA
CVT - AMENDED: Bank covenant waiver and trading update
Gentrack Annual Report 2024
December 20th Morning Report
Rua Bioscience announces launch of new products in the UK
TEM - Appointment to the Board of Directors
December 19th Morning Report