Sharechat Logo

Commerce Commission loses bid to extend fees claim against Bluestone Mortgages

Monday 20th August 2012

Text too small?

The Commerce Commission has lost a bid to widen its claim against Australian lender Bluestone Mortgages NZ over fees charged on early repayments.

Judge Patricia Courtney turned down the competition regulator's application to extend the timeframe of its claim in the High Court on Auckland earlier this month, saying she had to strike a balance between the rights of borrowers and lenders.

The judgment was published on the Justice Minister's website last week. The regulator alleges Bluestone breached the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act by charging unreasonable early repayment fees on loans that were typically granted for a 30-year term but usually repaid within the first four years.

The commission is seeking a refund for a number of those fees. Judge Courtney didn'taccept the commission's argument that the limitation period shouldn't begin until the fee is actually charged rather than from when the loan agreement is made.

She also disagreed with the regulator's contention that its claim was always representative, and that the amended claim was "no more than a particularisation of the existing claim and is not time barred."

Rather, she said each loan pleaded by the regulator represents a new cause of action with each fee charged specific to the terms of the individual loan.

"Although my finding may prevent some borrowers from claiming relief, I nevertheless consider that it would not be reasonable or fair if a borrower could circumvent the CCCF Act's limitation provisions simply by joining a representative claim," the judgment said.

The antitrust regulator was attempting to extend the timeframe of its initial claim between April 2005 and October 2006 by a further five years.

BusinessDesk.co.nz



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

PaySauce Quarterly Market Update - September 2024
October 2nd Morning Report
Rua Releases Annual Report for Year Ended 30 June 2024
SCL - Settlement of orchard sales
The Warehouse Group 2024 ASM and Director Nominations
AIR - Update on Chief Operational Integrity and Safety Officer
Comvita Limited - Annual Report 2024
September 27th Morning Report
Spark announces departure of Finance Director
FBU - Retail Entitlement Offer Opens