|
Printable version |
From: | "mick" <mick100@extra.co.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 8 Jun 2004 20:10:16 +1200 |
Risk/reward is very subjective
I think you ,Snoopy have a totally different idea
about risk than i do
My idea of a high risk company is one such as Scy
City
Very liitle shareholders equity,up to their
eyeballs in debt
and still running around NZ and Oz buying out
casinos ,all with borrowed money.
Would I be right in assuming that you still hold
these shares?
My idea of a low risk company is one such as CRS /
ASX
They have one million ozs of gold in reserves, 20
million cash in the bank,
no debt and are producing 230000 ozs of gold per
year
Pays an annual dividend as well.
I could name a few more in similar situations as
CRS
I suspect you would refer to CRS as a high
risk company Snoopy
I see CRS as a low risk company with high upside
potencial (a bargain at todays price)
Mick
|
Replies
|