Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - June 2004

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] Risk vs Return


From: "mick" <mick100@extra.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 20:10:16 +1200


Risk/reward is very subjective
I think you ,Snoopy have a totally different idea about risk than i do
 
My idea of a high risk company is one such as Scy City
Very liitle shareholders equity,up to their eyeballs in debt
and still running around NZ and Oz buying out casinos ,all with borrowed money.
Would I be right in assuming that you still hold these shares?
 
My idea of a low risk company is one such as CRS / ASX
They have one million ozs of gold in reserves, 20 million cash in the bank,
no debt and are producing 230000 ozs of gold per year
Pays an annual dividend as well.
 
I could name a few more in similar situations as CRS
I suspect you would refer to CRS  as a high risk company Snoopy
I see CRS as a low risk company with high upside potencial (a bargain at todays price)
 
 
Mick

Replies

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] Risk vs Return tennyson@caverock.net.nz
Previous by Date: [sharechat] Risk vs Return tennyson@caverock.net.nz ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: [sharechat] Risk vs Return tennyson@caverock.net.nz
Previous by Thread: Re: [sharechat] Risk vs Return Fiona Phibbs ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]