|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Wed, 19 May 2004 17:39:26 +1200 |
Today I received the largest piece of mail that has ever come through my postbox: A full A1 size poster from Rural Portfolio Investments which included insert photos of 'poster boys' Baird McConnon and Craig Norgate. Well, if RPI wanted to get my attention they got it! My attention was drawn to the fact that MD Allan Freeth had sold his entire shareholding in Wrightson's to RPI, a fact that somehow escaped my attention on October 4th 2003 when it happened. A quick search of the Herald archives showed up Freeth's reason. 400,000 of the shares that were sold were options just exercised. This is not uncommon if the option beneficiary doesn't have the spare few $100,000s lying around in a cash bank account that would allow him to own the shares outright without borrowing money for the privilege. If we assume an option excise price of 57c and a head share sale price of $1.45 that gives a figure of 88c of cash released per share sold. That makes $352,000. Add to this the $360,000 cash component of his salary that Freeth received last year and you have over $700,000 of cash flowing into the private Freeth bank account in FY2004. That caused me to have a bit of a chuckle when matched to the Auckland Herald Freeth quote: "I'm not a wealthy individual." He can't even use the excuse of living in Auckland can he? Somehow I don't expect to see the Freeth family queueing up at the soup kitchen anytime soon! The catch phrase: "Only $700,000 per year, how can I possibly survive." doesn't pull on my heart strings either. Nevertheless I accept Freeth's explanation in principle, if not in tone. I also note the cooment that the selling of his long term holding 14,500 head shares was a broker mistake that will be reversed. Also in the mail this week I received 'my broker's' recommendation on the WRI offer. ------------ RECOMMENDATION: SHAREHOLDERS SHOULD ACCEPT THE CASH OFFER. Prior to the announcement of the intended offer by RPI the shares were trading at $1.24 and are continuing to trade around $1.39 to $1.42 subsequent to the offer and release of the Independent Adviser’s report. The recent performance of WRI has lacked consistency, the half year to 31 December net profit was $2.735m, down 34%. Factors in this result were changes in trading conditions in Livestock and Wool, the underperformance of the Rural Supplies business, increased competition in the animal feed supplements market, slightly softer demand for seed, and delayed expansion of the finance business. The drop in the half year result followed on from the 2003 full year result which was down 12.7% to $18.475m. At the current share price of $1.39 WRI is trading on a forecast Price to Earnings Ratio (PE) of 15.3 to 16x. Rural stocks historically have traded on a PE of 10x or less and in comparison WRI’s listed competitor Pyne Gould Guinness is currently trading on a PE of 10.5x. While the dividend yield of WRI is good at current levels the stock appears to be overpriced and further share price growth, subsequent to the takeover, will be dependent on the company’s results of which there is no certainty due to the cyclical nature of its operations. We feel better value lies elsewhere in the market and hence advise clients to accept the cash offer and look to reinvest the proceeds. ------------ So it looks like they agree with me that accepting the cash offer is a better bet than acquiring the RPI notes. I am also aware that Norgate has questioned some of the multiples used in determining the WRI company valuation in the independent adviser's report. I was told that the independent report will be in the mail to me this week so I will be paying very close attention to some of those underlying valuation assumptions that the independent report contains. In the meantime I will be looking for more information from Norgate on what he plans to do with the company.should his partial takeover be successful. Indications are he needs to keep the dividends high to fund the leveraged nature of his bid. Does that mean the jettisoning of the Genesis Research investment, and a rather less aggressive expansion into finance than might be desired my current management? Norgate certainly hasn't said so, but reading between the lines, I think it does. In the meantime while things are warming up in the kitchen, I'll be checking the ingredients in the pantry and, at the same time looking at the kind of wall papering job I can do with the 'free wallpaper' I have just received from RPI ! SNOOPY -- Message sent by Snoopy on Pegasus Mail version 4.02 ---------------------------------- "Dogs have big tongues, so you can bet they don't bite them by accident" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
|