|
Hi Cristine (& Ruth)
Yes the topic has been done to death but the debate
will rage on while there are still those that consider themselves either pure TA
or pure FA. That is all a part of what makes life
interesting.
I am an avid follower of the sharechat postings and
often take considerable notice (ie put money up) based on what I read. To
those that have helped me to a win - THANKYOU - the information you have posted
has been great. To those that have had losses (as I have as well), keep
learning from the previous decisions you have made - knowledge may act to some
extent as a future "stop loss".
Keep up the good work (and don't stop
posting)
Regards
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:07
PM
Subject: Re: Re: [sharechat] Fundamentals
Snoopy! and his Pups woody replyGoody bye!!!!!!!!!!
Hi Ruth,
You speak on behalf of the
sharechat group?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:33
PM
Subject: Re: Re: [sharechat]
Fundamentals Snoopy! and his Pups woody reply Goody bye!!!!!!!!!!
Snoopy did a great fisking of the original posting. His
questions were
polite and very reasonable. If one is going to post about
"controversial"
topics one cannot complain when much of it is dissected.
Implying the topic
at hand is too esoteric is often the last resort when
one cannot logically
or factually rebut something.
People are very
attached to their beliefs, much more attached than they
usually let on.
When they are called on them they often depart, usually with
a few
ad-hominems thrown in for good measure ;-)
IMO the lack of replies is
nothing to do with not wanting to expand
horizons, but is because by and
large the topic has been done to death and
no one cares
anymore.
Regards,
Ruth
>>Hi Woody,
I have
always held your posts in very high regard and your last post was
no
exception.
It was excellent - pioneering - and very brave -
proposing the exploration
of uncharted territory and encouraging everyone
to broaden their horizons
(think outside the box).
In a
brain-storming session, participants are encouraged to 'think outside
the
box', take a non-judgemental perspective, and contribute both pros
and
cons in a positive manner.
In this way, new ideas that may
have great merit are not squashed before
they are considered in their
entirety.
Your post reminded me of this, and as a life-long learner,
I can say I was
truly excited by your post, your pioneering spirit, and
the prospect of
exploring these possibilities through the ensuing
exchanges.
Of course, to be effective - it helps to have more than
one contribution so
I can totally understand your recent
response.
Also, there is some risk associated with proposing anything
new and there is
always some resistance (and rejection) of the unknown
and of uncharted
(please forgive the pun) territory.
There are
some very knowledgeable and experienced people who contribute to
this
forum and I sincerely hope they re-weigh the possible benefits
against
the personal risk of derision through exploring something new,
offer to
contribute, and help you to reconsider, BUT; even if that
doesn't happen, I
still hold hope you will reconsider and stay -
please?
Regards,
Cris
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To
remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
|
See IRG research reports
