|
Printable version |
From: | "Allan Julian" <ajulian@xtra.co.nz> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:13:06 +1300 |
Gambling takes money out of the productive sector and puts it in the "unproductive sector" A case in point, when in NZ we got an instant gambling card purchased at the counter of shops, retailers reported counter sales of things as pencils, rubbers, rulers, [ the sort of things that should be purchased for the education of children] dropped. When we got lotto then it impacted further up the chain with less sales of school exercise books, note pads etc. Which goes up the chain to our pulp and paper industry, and ultimately forestry, what for? I personally have made more by not playing lotto for over the 10 years that it has been in NZ, than all my acquaintances who do play have made. [bases on a $5.00 per week average expenditure] Then there is the deeper reasoning that it teaches people that money doesn't have to be earned it can be won. All those youngsters going without their school books probably see it as their only hope to rise up to the middle classes. Allan. -----Original Message----- From: sharechat-owner@sharechat.co.nz [mailto:sharechat-owner@sharechat.co.nz]On Behalf Of Karyn W Sent: Tuesday, 16 March 2004 6:19 p.m. To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz Subject: [sharechat] Gambling stocks are not all bad! Hi I would like to point out that gambling companies contribute positively to society and people's well being, and the activity itself is detrimental to only a very small minority of people who have psychological issues long before they started gambling with their own, or others, money. Most people treat it as an enjoyable night out, or an occasional flutter on a big event. In terms of ethical investing, or on principle, gambling stocks are actually good companies because : (1) Gambling contributes large amounts of state tax revenue, which is spent on providing a number of public services that everyone enjoys. In Victoria, 15% of govt tax revenue comes from gambling. Without this income, all of us would be worse off, or paying higher taxes elsewhere. (2) A significant amount of money is donated to charities, who without the support of these companies, would not be able to do half the good they do in the community. Sky City in NZ for instance donates 2.5% of its profits to charity and community grants - which to date totals over $12 million. Jupiters Casino in Queensland has distributed over $46 million to local charities and organisations. (3) A large number of sports, community, and recreational clubs depend on gambling revenue for their existence, at all levels in the community. As an example, the AFL clubs Essendon, Hawthorn, and Geelong would not be financially viable without the contribution of gaming income. The recent restrictions on gaming machines and the non-smoking legislation is now seeing many small local clubs facing closure as members fees alone cannot cover the cost of running the club or sports team. So for the small number of people who have problems with gambling, many more millions of people benefit positively from the contributions these companies make in the community. In reality, they do more good than they do harm. Karyn Discl hold SKC, PBL, ALL _________________________________________________________________ What's your house worth? Click here to find out: http://www.ninemsn.realestate.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
|