Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - March 2004

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] SKC


From: "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 10:38:28 +1300


Title:
Hi winner69,

>
>Snoopy - good work re your analysis of Darwin and SKC
>
>Do you remember our raves on the message board about the high level of
>debt that SKC has. What is your take on the new debt they are taking
>on to fund Darwin - ie taking debt to $800M compared to shareholder
>equity of $240M odd.
>

For FY2004, let's assume a  poor performance scenario of a flat profit for SKC this financial year of $107.1m, with debt rising by $200m to $825m.

This gives a minimum long term debt repayment time of

$825m/$107.1m= 7.7 years

I am quite comfortable with that.

I noticed in the FY2003 annual report that there was a significant increase in current accrued expenses.    I expect this is due to the development of the Auckland convention centre venue.  But if that figure doesn't go down after the convention centre is opened, then this could be an early warning signal to watch for!

Longer term I think it is worth asking the question whether SKC is falling into the 'institutional imperative' trap.   That means getting bigger for the sake of it, rather than carefully deciding whether the expansion will add shareholder value!

I think SKC can add value in Australia by transforming what was just a 'casino' into a more general destination venue, whether that be through live entertainment, a tourist destination in its own right (think Auckland's Sky Tower)  or conferences.   If the grand Oz plan doesn't work out, those Australian assets would be readily saleable should SKC 'suddenly' need the funds.  This is a further reason why I think that SKC is not that risky, despite what is 'conventionally' thought of as a high ratio of debt to shareholders funds.

>
>Are you concerned that they appear to be able to borrow another
>$200M on top of this ... to fund further acquisitions?
>

No, I am relieved that they have the ability to do that!    But I would be concerned if SKC went off on another unrelated business tangent with that money.    I would like to see the Auckland convention centre working well before they funded yet another acquisition.

SNOOPY


--
Message sent by Snoopy
on Pegasus Mail version 4.02
----------------------------------
"Stay on the upside of the downside,
Anticipate the anticipation!"


References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] Dividends tennyson@caverock.net.nz
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] A play tennyson@caverock.net.nz ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] Singapore Wi-Fi Market update (Re: SKG) Karyn W
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] SKC winner69 . ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]