|
Printable version |
From: | "david.gibson" <david.gibson@k.co.nz> |
Date: | Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:11:28 +1300 |
Chatters,
It
seems the great sin that SEA are guilty of is daring to cross interests with GPG
and to come out on top.
There
is nothing in their conduct of management of TTP.NZX that gives me any great
concern.
-
Under their stewardship a couple of "basket case" property companies have been
merged and the combined entity is now looking very healthy. The management
skill required to bring this result about has required the long term focus of
the major shareholder.
- Fees
for related party services are benchmarked to Australasian industry
norms.
- As
long as I have been a shareholder (~3yrs) the advised strategy of the company is
to pursue growth through selective development projects. These activities
have been very successful. It is clearly inconsistent with this strategy
to payout large amounts of cash as a dividend.
I am
more concerned with the practice, throughout the listed property sector, to
payout dividends in excess of actual income (though the process of paying
dividends in shares, minimising the cash outlay). This practice diminishes
shareholder value when the shares are issued at less than NTA. The
practice is partially mitigated by the fact that the apparent high yield drives
share prices into the stratosphere and it is these high priced shares that are
issued instead of cash (issued at higher than NTA).
I must
confess - the analysis of TTP.NZX cashflows lead me to believe that they are
building up cash for some reason. (I presumed a dividend, I was
wrong). However, the best thing they could do with the available cash
resources is to start a share buy back.
-
Buying shares at better than 60% to NTA is better for the remaining
shareholders than a dividend.
- It
is more tax efficient for all concerned
- It
is the easiest way to achieve the advised growth strategy
objectives.
Finally, I think SEA have conducted themselves with
high honour as the TTP.NZX foundation shareholder. The 2003 year end
financial results stand to endorse the strategies of the past 9
years.
The
TTP.NZX strategy has been consistent - growth through managed development.
Hence, the lack of a declared dividend is simply consistent with this
strategy.
The
one area the strategy seems to be changing is the extension of the scope of
business to asia. I will attend the annual meeting just to understand the
scope of this change in company strategy. However, I do not fear the
change; nor do I suspect the motives of SEA.
Disclosure: TTP.NZX
shareholder
/dbg
|
References
|