Forum Archive Index - February 2004

["Malcolm Cameron" <malharcameron@hotmail.com>]

Hoop an attachment.IMSTP gif (680 bytes) showing on this one .





>From: "Richard Hooper" <hoop@ihug.co.nz>
>Reply-To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz
>To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz>
>Subject: Re: [sharechat] attachments..dancing H
>Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:45:18 +1300 (New Zealand Daylight Time)
>
>Hi
>  Re My dancing H problem.
>
>I reluctantly use only text. I forget sometimes that not everyone uses
>incredimail.
>
>When and if you do swap from microsoft Outlook to incredimail, you will
>never go back.
>Comparing the two it is like upgrading (in both performance + behind the
>times) from a  morris minor to a Ferrari.
>
>I never send attachments to Sharechat, so if you do see one on my e-mail
>push the delete button. I regularly scan for viruses, 3 different scan
>programs operating, no red alerts....but I will run a complete check using
>latest updates, just to make sure.
>Cheers
>Hoop   ( no dancing red H  :))   )
>
>-------Original Message-------
>
>From: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz
>Date: Friday, 30 January 2004 23:19:06
>To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz
>Subject: Re: [sharechat] attachments Malcolm
>
>On 30 Jan 2004, at 10:01, Malcolm Cameron wrote:
>
> > I have deleted 5 emails today from Richard Hooper all with Attachments
>
>That's Hoop's "dancing H"!!
>
>I recently had a client who designed an Outlook Express template for
>outgoing emails. The background was their new logo, repeated endlessly
>in a grid. The text was in their corporate colours, with their
>signature in a three different fonts. It was a shambles. The text of
>their emails was hard to read because of the background, the colours,
>while ok in their logo, looked terrible when applied to text, making
>the whole process of reading what they had to say a real effort. Why
>did they do this? 1. Because they could. 2. Because their email client
>had these "features" highlighted by its developers, and 3. Because they
>thought (incorrectly, as they found out) that their clients would just
>love it.
>
>Regarding format for outgoing emails, I always recommend that people
>use plain text. Occasionally, bold is useful, but using *asterisks* is
>just as good an alternative for emphasis.
>
>No HTML. No fancy signature attachments. No colours. Just text. This
>means that attachments tend to be attached documents rather than fancy
>bits and pieces. Of course, if one is using a free online email
>facility, then this can sometimes be hard to achieve.
>
>Regards
>
>Robin
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
>http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
>
>
>.

_________________________________________________________________
Hot chart ringtones and polyphonics. Go to  
http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilemania/default.asp


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/