|
Printable version |
From: | Gavin Treadgold <gav@rediguana.co.nz> |
Date: | Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:06:24 +1300 |
> Two points to clarify in you post Gav. > 1. Habeas corpus does not refer to martial law, but an order > to the government to "produce the body", As I said, I couldn't remember if I had the right name, and I was in a motel with expensive net charges, so wasn't going to go surfing to find the right one :) > 2. Your are correct in saying that our individual States > control their own National Guards, to a point. The President > does have the power to Nationalize an individual States > national guard and make them part of the national regular > army. Yes, most governments do have the power to nationalise resources, as does ours. I just didn't want to go too far into the nitty-gritties and technicalities! The US however is a very large place to clamp down, so you would see most focus around the major cities i.e. NY, DC, LA etc. Cheers Gav ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|