|
Printable version |
From: | mixtrader <mixtrader@clear.net.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:00:21 +1300 |
Hi Terry
Forgive me if my understanding is wrong but I understood
that options have two components, the option price and the exercise price.
The exercise price is often the market price at the time the options were
offered (less the value attached to the option at issue). Depending on the
type of option it may either be exercised at any time until the expiry date, or
may be exercised only on the expiry date. If it is not exercised by or on
expiry date the option lapses and is valueless. Exercise of the option
requires payment of the exercise price. As such, the extent of dilution is
the net difference between exercise price and market value at the time the
options were exercised. Obviously, if market value is below exercise price
only a fool would wish to exercise the options. My understanding is that
the number of shares now held is increased and at the same time the total share
capital is increased through payment for the exercise of
the options.
Options granted/sold should be recorded in the financial
statements along with the average option price and the exercise value. I
haven't checked WRI's statements to verify this has occurred here but I have
seen it with other companies. Options are often "granted" to directors and
executive management as a form of performance based incentive (which brings with
it problems of short term thinking/planning), they must still pay the exercise
price to convert these options to shares. Options are also freely traded
on the market and can act as a source of cash inflow to the company through
selling options. If the options aren't exercised the company got the money
for nothing. If they are exercised the shareholders total capital is
increased to the extent of the exercise price, and the total number of shares on
issue is increased at the same time.
For Marathon's percentage of shares held to have dropped
by 0.57% due to the exercise of options suggests that approx 9.25 million
options were exercised. The question I am left with is, how much has the
value of Marathon's holding changed in the period between the option holder
acquiring the options and subsequently exercising them? While votes may be
diluted I would suggest that market value of their holding has been
significantly increased over this period.
|
References
|