|
Hi all,
I think it's time for a stimulating grown-up debate
...
I believe toilet paper rolls should be hung in such
a position as to allow the paper to flow with the least amount of resistance,
therefore; the next available sheet should be hanging down at the
back of the roll in what I prefer to call the 'underhang' (as
opposed to 'overhang') position.
Apart from my personal preference,
I admit to having no real qualifications in this
discipline.
The debate is now open and contributions are
welcome from both 'underhangers' and 'overhangers' alike.
Regards,
Cris
PS Just a little light-hearted play to
end the day.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 4:47
PM
Subject: Re: [sharechat] TA Rules
>
>Good Snoopy well done only your main problem is
that you do not
have
>ONE CLUE as to how TA Chartists operate. I
could not care what AMP
was
>the Chart was all I looked at. It could
sell bananas for all I care.
>The Chart gave sell signals. The same with
Chrysler Buy signals were
>the go, and this was long before the
Merger.
>
>You see my point Snoopy TA does not interest itself
whether crooks
run
>a business or nor, just the Charts that is all I
look at. The Time to
>Price balance and the Cycles. I don't even know
half the time what
>sort of companies they are.
>
>Your
argument is poor Snoopy <snip>
>
Woody, you made a
suggestion that F/A would have lead to you buying
AMP before the share
price plunged, not buying Chrysler before the
share price rocketed, and
buying into Enron. I have pointed out to you
that certainly
with a value investors F/A hat on that 'value F/A' would not
have
lead you to buy AMP nor Enron. Given the nature of F/A you
will
also know that it cannot predict takeover offers out of left
field. The
idea that F/A failed to predict a merger
between Daimler Benz and
Chrysler should come as no surprise to those who
know how company
specific F/A works.
Of course
being a 'pure T/A' guy, you don't care how F/A works. But this
is
your own chosen path. If you seriously want to debate the
merits of
T/A vs F/A, you have to make the effort to understand how F/A
people
think, even if you don't agree with it. If you
willfully ignore all aspects
of F/A culture then having an F/A vs T/A
debate with you is pointless.
If you make a statement on F/A you cannot
expect an answer back in
the language of T/A. The idea that
T/A may *also* have saved you from
those situations has nothing to do with
the point I was making.
Now let me throw a T/A question at you, which I
hope you can accept
such a thing from someone who quote :
"would
not even buy an icecream on your Knowledge of TA ."
as you put
it. Let's see if you can come up with something positive
this
time.
If you are trading trends you are saved by your stop
loss if the trend
goes against you. But if you trade too
often around small rises that in
itself can have a negative affect on your
returns.
How do you get the balance right so
that your stop losses are not so
aggressive that they strip the best
profits from your
trading?
SNOOPY
--
Message sent by
Snoopy
on Pegasus Mail version
4.02
----------------------------------
"Dogs have big tongues, so you
can bet they don't
bite them by
accident"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To
remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
|
See IRG research reports
