|
Printable version |
From: | C Darby <cd@pl.net> |
Date: | Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:41:06 +1300 |
Ditto to Marilyn's comments Wilson's whiskey out of Dunedin was 'cleverly' marketed too. 45 South and Wilson's were the two brands. Rough as guts and hardly a worry for the crudest of Scottish distilleries. Plonk was probably the best descriptive. Strange how Dorchester Pacific keeps making security announcements to the NZX re 42 Below. I wouldn't have thought it integral to their business to warrant half a dozen announcements in two months. Stacking the board with a seamstress (Walker) and a sailor (Dalton) is all part of a company overloaded with marketing hype. What I would want to know is the results of a few independent taste tests with some hardened Vodka drinkers. How does it measure up alongside Stoly and Russian Standard? Does it go down well or is it Kiwi potato brew that comes up soon after going down? Is it made from melted ice (as are the best Russian vodkas) and free of additives and flavourings? Or is it like the whiskey 45 South with its flavoursome McKenzie Country gravel taste in lieu of the highland peats of Scotland. I admire the marketing machine behind 42 Below but will this product pass over the lips of experienced vodka drinkers a second time in a product market littered with also rans full of equally good ideas marketed with comparable craft but rejected by the brutal consumer. I just cannot see half a dollar of value in this IPO but would be delighted to be proved wrong. Charlie ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
|