|
Printable version |
From: | "mick" <mick100@extra.co.nz> |
Date: | Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:55:03 +1000 |
For one who follows fundamental s there is probably
no better growth share to follow than GPG . They invest in such a broad
spectrum of shares. As with a trader , if they make a rare mistake they quit
that investment. A particular criteria appears to be that which has
been around a long time . Proven the test of time .eg. shipyards. In
fact Ron Brierley cut his international teeth on Hong Kong shipyards via
Industrial Equity Pacific Ltd. That which can be resurrected because
perhaps previously mismanaged yet capable of resurrection or
salvage.I found that if you can access GPG`s portfolio you can monitor
each and every share therein on the UK or US market overnight and be one jump
ahead of the market as the next day starts in NZ. I made it my job to know their
portfolio investment backgrounds totally - to be better informed than
99.9% of other shareholders. That is not arrogance!.It is cautious
investing.
Can anyone suggest any other share
that you can revalue each day independently of information released by that
company without feeling vulnerable to misinformation by 3rd parties with their
own agendas. Michael Cullen should put an undue investment bias on GPG in any
disposition of National Superannuation investment funds . Rather than relying on
investment advisers who would not be half as worldly wise as Sir Ron Brierley.By
past experience I do not consider myself biased. Sir Ron Brierley,I
feel has a social conscience, in the interests of New Zealanders who might have
felt they were let down by Brierley Investments Ltd . That Company at one
time had over 180,000 NZ. shareholders.Sir Ron Brierley appears to have a
mission to regain the confidence of those who switched to GPG.
I agree
Good stuff
Mick |
|