Forum Archive Index - September 2003
Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.
Re: [sharechat] Cycles
SORRY FOR THE OCCASIONAL SPELLING MISTAKE but I born into
the Dutch and Indonesian languages.
I also left school at 12 years old and spent my youth in
the Indonesian Merchent Navy as a cook.
English is my adopted language that I taught myself
only 5 Years ago!!!!! Spelling it is hard for me as I come from two
Phonetic language backgrounds.
As for predictions Yes I do believe that markets factor in
good and bad news days weeks sometimes years before the actual
event.
As for Chaos.
Well the Inkjet printer was designed around the fact that
a scientist was told that a dripping tap was not random. In trying to disprove
this theory he discovered that YES indeed a dripping tap drips at a calculated
mathematical pace. Having thus discovered that he went on to Invent the Inkjet
printer wich is based on the FACT not the Theory that drips are
mathmatical.
In some sense it is, but nobody is capable of perceiving
it at any
significant scale.
More people than you could imagine percieve it Far
more.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 3:30
AM
Subject: Re: [sharechat] Cycles
On Friday, September 26, 2003, at 12:37 PM, fntradingsolutions
wrote:
> You know you people are born into a cycle, you live in a
cycle. You
> work to a cycle. The Moon, the Sun the Universe all move
within a
> cycle. Plants and animals move in a cycle.
I'm with you
up to here. I even cycle in a cycle.
> Yet you fail to that the Market
also moves in cycles. Parochial.
> If you really do not believe that the
all the Universe in predestined
> and preordained,
In some sense
it is, but nobody is capable of perceiving it at any
significant
scale.
> and that it was created by a master Mathmatician. Not a Big
Band full
> of chaos.
As in The Count Basie Big Band?
>
Then look at the perfect hexagon formations of inanimate objects. and
>
the perfect
> pentagon formations of all living things.
I can see
what you're getting at, but it's to do with the mechanics of
describing how
things go together. Yes, the only things left tend to be
well-arranged,
mainly because the other ones didn't make it ...
We didn't get an answer
on whether TA can predict earthquakes and
terrorist attacks. I believe these
events are absolutely related to
other events, but how exactly, and which
events, is the question.
Haven't scientists using chaos models had most
success with
micro-prediction of seismic
events?
Cheers
Robin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To
remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
See IRG research reports
