|
Printable version |
From: | "Cristine Kerr" <criskerr@optusnet.com.au> |
Date: | Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:57:35 +1000 |
Hi Macdunk,
Are you proposing to compare success of FA and
TA?
Even though I trade FA (because at present I am
comfortable in this arena), I am open to TA. I try to keep
an open mind. I don't ever want to stop learning.
I am enjoying the exchanges of TA traders but must
confess my numerical reasoning is not sufficient when
what I read here is presented in terminology I am unfamiliar
with.
I do not believe one trading style is above the
other, indeed, all information is relevant in all decision-making because to
make the best decision we must have access to the best information from as
many sources as possible. We then weigh up that information based on our own
knowledge and experience and formulate an opinion on the usefulness or otherwise
of that information.
In an earlier mail I proposed a philosophical debate on
FA/TA only. It was not my intent to raise one above the other and I apologise if
it was interpreted that way.
I am happy to reveal my gains if it's of interest but since
I've only been trading for two months, it would not be sufficient to
present as a track record and hence, would not add value to
any research.
Accuracy would also be impacted by other variables such
as level of experience in FA and/or TA, or where traders apply both styles,
etc.
Hope everyone has a great trading day.
Regards,
Cris
|
References
|