|
Printable version |
From: | Phaedrus <Phaedrus@techemail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 22 Jun 2003 13:51:40 -0700 (PDT) |
Snoopy, Your argument is illogical. Before I tackle your misconceptions, let's define a trend and a trend follower so that we are at least discussing the same things:- An uptrend is a series of higher highs and higher lows. A trend follower is one that looks for stocks that are in an uptrend, buys, and holds until the uptrend ends. You state "You make the assumption that most trend followers are as meticulous and sophisticated as you are." No I do not. The trendline break system that I use is probably the simplest of all trend following techniques. Sophisticated? I think not! Additionally, in an attempt to cater for other trend followers interested in trading either more and less actively than me, I incorporated multiple moving averages into the chart, thus covering people short-term trading right through to the very conservative users of a 200 day ema. Again, using moving average crossovers as exit signals is a very simple technique that is anything but sophisticated. "What would have happened if a person scanning the daily papers saw WHS trading in mid April at $5.30 or so and saw the price rising? They saw it had bounced off the support level at $5.30 twice in recent months and could see the price rising again so decided it was a good time to buy." This person may have bought, but they would NOT have been a trend follower. Trend followers would have seen that WHS was making lower highs, price action was below their chosen moving average, and that WHS was still in a downtrend. There is simply NO WAY a trend follower would have bought here! ".....none of this would be any consolation to the *unsophisticated* TAer that bought in at $5.30 in mid April." Anyone buying at $5.30 in mid April would have been buying into an established downtrend. Even the most unsophisticated user of TA would be unlikely to do this. You claim to be using an "*unsophisticated* TAer" as an example, but in fact their hypothetical actions show a total ignorance of even the most basic TA principles. Unfair! "As I see it, my point that an (unsophisticated) pure trend follower may have indeed lost money by selling out WHS in the low $4 range, still stands." Snoopy, trend followers (even unsophisticated ones) sell at the END of UPTRENDS, they DO NOT sell at the end of DOWNTRENDS. They then buy at the beginning of Uptrends - see arrows on chart. I went out of my way to include in the chart a 200 day moving average such as would be used by conservative (read unsophisticated) trend followers. The point of showing these different systems on the same chart was to demonstrate the ALL trend followers would have been out of WHS well before the meltdown - no matter how simple the system they used. In addition ALL of these various systems kept their users out of the "rally" that sucked you in. Regards, Phaedrus. _____________________________________________________________ Are you a Techie? Get Your Free Tech Email Address Now! Visit http://www.TechEmail.com _____________________________________________________________ Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get you@yourchoice.com, No Ads, 6MB, IMAP, POP, SMTP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
|