|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Sun, 18 May 2003 20:30:01 +1200 |
> > Westpac got rid of 13.05 million shares in tranzrail the week before > the price hike. Says a lot for financial advice dont you think?. > Without the benefit of foresight and given Westpac had a shareholding, I would say that action of Westpac (Investment Funds) was quite sensible. Tranzrail were/are facing bankruptcy within the space of a few weeks. Westpac would have looked very red faced if their entire investment in Tranzrail had gone down the toilet. It is impossible for even the best managers to get it right every time, and a rescue bid by a white knight was never certain until it happened. Westpac obviously judged the bankruptcy of Tranzrail to be a serious possibility, which it was. Of course, none of that explains why Westpac were invested in Tranzrail in the first place...... SNOOPY -- Message sent by Snoopy on Pegasus Mail version 4.02 ---------------------------------- "Dogs have big tongues, so you can bet they don't bite them by accident" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
|