|
Printable version |
From: | Robin Benson <rob@hammerheadmedia.co.uk> |
Date: | Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:03:45 +0100 |
Hi Allan On Sunday, Apr 13, 2003, at 08:08 Europe/London, in response to Gooner, Allan Potts wrote: > Lastly, your news is not only inacurate, but out of date. It was > first thought that an American tank shot a Tank shell at Al Jazerra > and killed and injured some of their people. Upon investigation, and > after inspection it was found that not only would a tank shell not > have inflicted the damage that was done, but that the tank cannon > would have had to shoot around a corner. Yet again, I'm reminded of the saying "never believe any of what you hear and only half of what you see". One interpretation of this would suggest that even a good portion of what one actually sees in person may still be clouded by one's own knowledge and assumptions. It's a paradox really, because knowledge, assumptions, and experience are major factors in interpreting anything. Now, what you hear is driven by people talking, that is as a result of motivation, whatever what that motivation, or agenda, may be. Seeing is relatively passive in comparison. Consider then media in this context: what is the reason for it to exist, and what is the agenda. Notice that the saying above doesn't preclude what one hears or sees being correct, but just that it can't be believed, or in other words, taken as intrinsically true. So, what would be interesting would be for the sources of the statement above to be disclosed, allowing a limited assessment of the statements based on one's opinion of the sources concerned. > This is not just BS. With respect Allan, how do you know? Kind regards Robin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|