|
Printable version |
From: | "John Ascroft" <jascroft@jadeworld.com> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:05:31 +1300 |
It all depends of course, obviously relating the income to the house price only really works for the first house. Assume there is no interest and you earn 50,000 - then you could buy a 150,000 house (which in ChCh would get you a livable 3br in a less popular area). By paying a third of your salary off it, then it would be paid off in 9 years. Then using the same rules you could buy a $300,000 house. If nothing else, I think the rule should be that the mortgage is approx 2.5 to 3x your annual salary. This make a lot more sense. The banks have their own sets of rules for affordability, from memory they don't want to see more than 40% of your income on mortgage costs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
|