|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 11 Feb 2003 23:50:28 +0000 |
Hi Morgy, > > I know what he said & it wasnt what you said regardless > of the mass of information you put forth, > > I've told you twice already Morgy. So I'll say it just once more. What I said was *not* what Travis said. I see from the above that you agree with me. So at last we agree on something. Amazing! > >I'm sure someone read it and was educated by it. By the way > your 10k email doesnt really use any bandwith to speak of, dont > stress about it. > Try to see the big picture Morgy. It may be only 10k to you, but it is also 10k to everyone else on sharechat. And how many subscribers are there to sharechat? Heaps! So the impact of a simple 10k message is far more than 10k. > >At no point did I criticise Travis on his discussion regarding >"support and resistance", I think you will find that was Phaedrus >(by the way I have framed Phaedrus's email and hung it on the wall). >Kindly direct your right of reply to the correct person !. > You criticised Travis for making 'predictions', when Ben Graham said 'predictions' were unreliable. Travis criticised Phaedrus for making 'predictions' (including support and resistance). Predictions is the common thread here and that is what I was writing about and "Great Scott" look at the header on this thread! Do you see the link? Perhaps when I was allegedly changing topic all the time what I was really doing was talking *on topic* about predictions of all kinds instead of having a one on one beat up with you and/or/afterwards then Phaedrus? I'm sorry. Next time I'll just be personally vindictive as it appears that's what you expected of me. > >once again on 10/02/03 that relate to this thread and if at any >point you can show "me" writing of or mentioning "support and >resistance" & or any criticisim of such in regard to Travis's >email, I will donate $10.00 to Team New Zealand . > You are taking all this far too personally Morgy > >I am extrememly flattered that you confused me with Phaedrus, If I >was him I would be gutted however. I therefore did not read the long >waffle that followed as it was not directed at me given you had the >wrong person !. > > YOU ARE TAKING ALL THIS FAR TOO PERSONALLY MORGY! > > > accuse me of things I did not write and > even confuse me with someone else , where could we possibly go with > this?. > This is a general discussion on the use of predictions in investing. So I confused who wrote what? That's not really important. Opposing ideas are the targets, and I care not who puts them forwards. People are not in my gunsights. At this point I'll correct a typo in my last post "A Buffetologist does base investment decisions on what the market may think over the next few months." should read "A Buffetologist does NOT base investment decisions on what the market may think over the next few months." > >I always appreciate a good discussion on points of > difference when there is a clear definition of the topic, your > moving target philosophy is a bit much. > Keep hunkered down in that trench. I've got my eyes on the horizon looking for the Red Baron and my Sopwith Camel is at the ready. If Gerry looks like coming over the top I'll give him a buzz to alert you. Keep those guns at the ready. Gerry could come from any direction at any time, and it looks like your number is on the blade of Gerry's bayonet! Toodle Pip. See you at the World War One cafe on the front in France one day if we manage to get through all this. SNOOPY --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "Dogs have big tongues, so you can bet they don't bite them by accident" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|