|
Printable version |
From: | "gooner" <nickk@quicksilver.net.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 10 Feb 2003 22:38:57 +1300 |
Travis Are these the same financial planners who have lost billions in the United States in the last 3 years? Or, are they the ones with Tower and/or AMP who have blindly told their 'clients' to stay with international shares because 'one day' they will come right! There are many Gold stocks that pay a dividend - ie earning money. I can show you as many winners in the gold stocks as losers. It depends who you believe and I prefer not to believe people who invest your money for you for a commission irrespective of whether you win or lose. Ever heard of a financial planner/fund manager being sued for negligence as a result of his/her advice? I haven't but I wish had. The tech boom (bust actually) has nothing to do with the gold enlightenment. Stocks were trading on a p/e of 2000 during those times; on borrowed millions; with no history of earnings. Where did the 'e' come from????????? Bolnisi Gold (BSG:ASX as an example) has a p/e of 8 and pays a dividend! Finally, your claim of the 'stocks you can't tell us about' (sssshhhhh) sounds like the bloody tech bust. As a financial planner, please share your advice with us without the 'no warranty' clauses! Cheers Gooner > I attended a seminar the other day put on for > financial planners where the speaker happened to be > the manager of one of Australia's biggest and best > resources managed funds. > > During his talk he mentioned repeatedly the ridiculous > prices being paid for many gold stocks, particularly > those on the Australian market. According to their > analysis many of these mines were priced at such high > levels that they seem already to have factored into > the share price this massive continued bull market > everyone is predicting. > > His claim was that clearly there is a bubble in gold > stocks, amateur speculators with absolutely no idea of > the concept of intrinsic value are buying gold stocks > at whatever price they can get them believing that > they can only go higher because gold seems to be going > higher. > > He backed up his argument with several detailed > valuations which included a sensitivity analysis of > mine profits vs gold appreciation and it appears that > very few people are going to get out of this with > their skins intact if gold fails to double in price. > > It is much like the tech boom of the late 90s. "The > Internet is where all commerce will be in the future > and therefore no price is to high to pay for Yahoo!" > is much the same as "gold is in a bull market, > supposedly central banks are going to get short > squeezed so everyone should buy gold stocks". > > He did give several examples of stocks with very > compelling valuations, but I'm not at liberty to tell > you which ones they are... 8P > > Travis > www.travismorien.com > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
|