|
Printable version |
From: | "Pat Fields" <pat_fields@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 30 Jan 2003 02:34:28 -0500 |
Hi Snoopy, Thanks for your comprehensive and very helpful answer! >Often the secondary market for capital notes is the the >place to spot these higher risk capital note investments. Yes - I wouldn't consider getting into capital notes on subscription but only ofter they are listed. I would like to get a feel for the market's perception of risk as well as for their liquidity. >I've looked at getting back into the capital note market at various >stages myself, but so far I haven't been able to make the numbers >stack up. The 'problem', if you want to see it that way, is that >there are so many high yielding head shares on the New Zealand market >with good prospects that taking the risk of locking your money into >lower yielding capital notes I find hard to justify. In my very *rough* assesment of capital notes vs. yields, I came to the conclusion that the capital notes of some good companies have a higher yield than the yield from shares (e.g., GPG) whereas in other cases it's the other way round (e.g., Sky City). So, I guess, the difference between going with one type versus the other one (putting aside risk) is the mix of capital vs. income gain buyers would wish (assuming a share price increase). > >Of course the shares may have a more volatile ride on the way to >their higher expected return. But capital notes will go up and down >in value as well, so you don't get away from the volatility of your >investment if you buy them. And if smoothing the volatility is your >goal perhaps another way of going about things is to invest half the >money in bank deposits and the rest in high yielding head shares. As long as I hold them until redemption (and the company's ability to repay them remains intact) the real loss is the opportunity cost of being locked in a potentially lower yield if economic conditions change (e.g., increase in the cash rate, inflation, etc.) While writing me original post, an issue I had in mind was the convertibility of the capital notes into shares upon maturity. If I wanted the cash back but the company chooses to issue shares, I wonder what would the chances be of not recovering my initial amount in full if I sold the shares on the very day of redemption. I wonder if the issue of dilution coupled with the risk of many ex-capital note holders selling would push the share price down to a level below than that used for the conversion hence not being able to recover my full amount. _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
|