Forum Archive Index - November 2002

["tonysw" <tonysw@xtra.co.nz>]

Chris
I read same article and was rather miffed as to NSCC comment re expense of
Organic Interceptor. Real comparisons need to be done re Toxic chemicals vs
Organic Interceptor
and any on going savings to the community thru health issues etc. But as
usual NSCC only take the short term view............perhaps to tie in with
the time they will be in office!
 Tony

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris" <cd@pl.net>
To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz>
Sent: Wednesday, 20 November 2002 11:31 a.m.
Subject: [sharechat] CER - Certified Organics


>
> Like others I have been very weary of the flood of positive releases
coming
> from this company yet a miserable share price results.
>
> So I was encouraged to read the lead story in the INL group newspaper,
North
> Shore Times, that North Shore City Council is seeing excellent results
from
> trials of Organic Interceptor. CER's chemical free weed control product is
> now in extended trial around the Devonport area where the residents are
> ardent campaigners against chemical weed control.
>
> The drawback to Organic Interceptor is the price and CER are going to have
> to sharpen their pencil to get this product and the company as a whole
going
> forward. There is also some resistance to the residual pine fragrance
which
> permeates the air but this can only be viewed alongside the risk of
> continuing to spray neighbourhood streets with toxic chemicals like
RoundUp.
> It is only a matter of time before the lawsuits roll in on that one.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
>



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/