Forum Archive Index - September 2002

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

Messages by Date [	Next by Date	Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [	Next by Thread	Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [	New message	Reply to this message ]

Printable version

Re: Re: [sharechat] STUDY STOCK

From:	"Capitalist" <capitalist@paradise.net.nz>
Date:	Wed, 4 Sep 2002 12:36:41 +1200

Well Snoopy, wouldn't it be great if we all had your amazing intellectual firepower.I guess there are far too many great unwashed on this forum, but what can one do?<sigh>

Don't tell me people are pathetic for wanting to honour their positive potentialities.

Craig said:

<snip>

You mentioned you were looking at a "long term play". Maybe you could have expounded why? If long term, then why does a TA technique (which most will acknowledge falls more to timing ... and long term .. this is less significant) fall into your trading plan ...?

So yes ... you have a right to feel "abused", BUT ... you did everything to provoke it by providing no idication you had done anything to support your own trading decisions ... except choose a stock.

Since when does one have to justify one's investment decisions to anyone on this board? The man only asked for an opinion - no-one is forced to reply. It is pompous intellectual pretension like this that puts others off posting.

Messages by Date [	Next by Date:	Re: [sharechat] Undervalued Gems article - found it tennyson@caverock.net.nz
	Previous by Date:	[sharechat] Posting Charts Phaedrus ]
Messages by Thread [	Next by Thread:	[sharechat] Undervalued Gems article - found it Tim Stubbs
	Previous by Thread:	RE: Re: [sharechat] STUDY STOCK Craig Hoskin ]
Post to the Forum [	New message	Reply to this message ]