Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - June 2002

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

[sharechat] Nick K vindicated already for his sell decision + CHARTS


From: Jefley Aitken <jefley@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:56:08 +1200


Yes, thanks Nick K, you made me do some serious thinking.  As a result I 
stuck to my rules about limiting losses and did some selling but, i expect, 
not enough.  -- and i didn't take up any vertex!

I seem to remember someone (phaedrus?) posting that the dow was looking 
very toppish well before september, and that he cashed up before then.

does a widespread (global) slither make a mockery of individual stock 
charts?

I still have fbu and tel that are sliding around, and in a ranging market I 
would hold both until either my stop-loss, or strong chart signals yell 
sell.
but as i see hell in a hand-basket coming closer,  i'm wondering if there 
is a new set of rules-of-thumb.

Snoopy, i can imagine that you would say if the fundamentals were ok when i 
bought, and they have not changed, then i should hold, but i'm not really a 
long-term investor and i get very unhappy when my capital appears to erode.

what can charts tell the "company-pickers-but-TA timing" bunnies in these 
conditions?
regards, jefley.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/


Replies

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: [sharechat] Charts in Hard Times. Phaedrus
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] Quick competition- how far dow fall today? Ben Dutton ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: [sharechat] Nick K vindicated already for his sell decision tennyson@caverock.net.nz
Previous by Thread: RE: [sharechat] Charts in Hard Times. Cheng, Soo ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]