|
Printable version |
From: | "Dick O'Connor" <callme_nz@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Wed, 22 May 2002 23:12:42 +0000 |
Winner, I was a keen holder of BCH shares until I sold out towards the end of last year, and the figures you mentioned yesterday look a bit strange. BCH was selling for $8.25 at the end of Dec 98.The 2:1 split was made in May 99. Just before the split, BCH was selling for just over $10, and it droppped back to $5 after the split If you had been given 100 shares at Christmas 98 they would have increased to 200 at a cost of $4.12 each. If this is any help: Taking into account the extra shares BCH holders would have got, and the special dividend, and the phase of the moon, and anything else I could think of, the post-merger price in my case would have been $7.15 (if I had held on). I sold out because of the PE ratios of more than 50%..they were just too high in all logic. The co has said it believes it can maintain 20% growth, although this still has to be proved. Under the PEG rating (which has come into wider and wider use in recent years)the PE rating would need to fall to 20 to make the co attractive...and it would still depend on being able to achieve the 20% growth. Cheers _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
|