Forum Archive Index - May 2002
Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.
[sharechat] Container Port heads up was: Study finds five ports overcharging
From: |
Marilyn Munroe <who.c@res.co.nz> |
Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2002 10:41:16 +1200 |
Snoopy.
Lyttelton is the front runner in the race to attract the large new P&O
Nedlloyd container vessels. This is because of its geographical location
adjacent to the largest South Island population and manufacturing center.
Timaru is a non starter because it does not have the cranes.
Port Chalmers is a bigger threat but it suffers from its distance from the
major Sth Island center. It would mean export containers to or from the
Christchurch area would have extra on shore transport costs and extra transit
time.
While the Lyttelton Port Co. management are in the most advantageous position
they will be unaware of the cards that the shipping co will play or the
extent that Port Chalmers will drop its pants to secure this business.
We await developments with interest.
There is intense competition between Ports of Auckland & Tauranga.
Tauranga invested heavily in a new container terminal at Sulphur Point on the
build it and they will come principal. They built it and they did not come.
Tauranga snatched away the ANZDL line service to North America from Auckland
by building an inland port in South Auckland. They rail containers from there
to the ships side in Tauranga. To my mind this is buying business as they
must be paying the railroad $500 a box. However Tauranga seems to be
profitable so maybe I am wrong.
Boop-boop-de-do Marilyn
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/