|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:09:02 +0000 |
Hi Derek, > > >You seem to have a good grasp of the proposed tax, >can you please give comment on the following questions. > > I've only read Cullen's comments on Friday and referred back to the tax committee review report, in particular the bits he said he approves of. So I'm working on logic, not inside information. > > >Does the Risk Free Return Method formula apply in >addition or instead of capital gains tax? > > By capital gains I presume you mean shares bought and sold in share trading? This is a tough call to estimate considering the law is not yet drafted. It is possible that at the start of the year you will be declared to own a certain dollar pool of 'capital stock' (being the total value of trading shares you have held at any one time in the last year) that you will use for trading. Let's say it is $100,000 in your case. The 'deemed rate of return' would be 5% (say, as determined by the government) and if your tax rate was 36% you would be required to pay 0.36 x 0.05 x $100,000 = $1800 at the end of the year. This amount would be due no matter what your trading results were for the year. Would they tax you on capital gains from your share trading as well? My guess is no, but you would also lose the deductability of losing trades if this was the case. Nevertheless if you were unlucky enough to lose all of your $100,000 you would still owe $1800 tax. If you were a 'good' trader you might actually be better off under this scheme, but only if they decided to stop taxing your capital profits. > > >One solution may be to move to Australia or >the UK (if I got really desperate) do you know if >either of these countries have a similar tax? > > No, neither of these countries has a 'wealth tax' as proposed by Cullen. But both have capital gains taxes (for share investors, not just traders as is the case here), and certainly at least the UK still has death duties, albeit with a rather high threshold in $NZ terms (around 250,000 pounds). > > >Would trading as a company rather than an individual >allow me to get around this tax? > I am sure it could be arranged. Set up a new private company offshore (try Bermuda, it worked for Brierley's) so that it holds all your shares. Although the shares it holds are listed, the new company itself isn't. Because you hold shares in this offshore company that isn't listed, you will therefore escape the wealth tax. Easy isn't it? I am sure that the big boys will be setting up such companies as we speak and it will only be the Mum and Dad investors that will be caught in the wealth tax web in the future. SNOOPY --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "Sometimes to see the wood from the trees, you have to cut down all the trees." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|