Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - February 2002

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] Peptech PTD hits $5


From: "Nick Kearney" <nickk@quicksilver.net.nz>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 07:59:33 +1300


Yes...Gerry has done well.

This share was .40c three years ago.

The question is now...what will be the next PTD?

Cheers

Nk
----- Original Message -----
From: "Viewpoint ." <viewpoint_@hotmail.com>
To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:56 PM
Subject: [sharechat] Peptech PTD hits $5


> Well, Gerry has done it again
>
> Even though telling all on Sharechat about PTD appears to have bought
about
> his demise (on this site) suppose Gerry is having the last laugh.
>
> PTD closed at $5.00 today. Is the announcement re the much vaunted patent
> close? Maybe Monday is the day?
>
> Most of you know where to sign in to get the action and the latest goss on
> PTD. All Gerry's followers are happy tonight - even though their favourite
> cricketing sons are not in the final.
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/


References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: [sharechat] VTL Phaedrus
Previous by Date: [sharechat] Gold and derivatives Peter ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] Peptech PTD hits $5 Viewpoint .
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] Peptech PTD hits $5 Viewpoint . ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]