|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:53:19 +0000 |
Hi Ben, > > >Here's an interesting article by James Cramer on TheStreet.com > >http://www.thestreet.com/funds/smarter_up/10007009.html > >In it he predicts that because of several high profile accounting >related sell-offs, investors are going to move towards companies >with simple balance sheets that are easy to understand. > > > I think many New Zealanders learned the downside of companies that shuffle assets between sub-companies of their own, way back in 1987! But there are a couple of recent examples of 'complex accounting' that have have worried me. The first is Air New Zealand's determination to count their transactions associated with the purchase of aircraft as 'investing activities'. I can't see that these transactions should be "ring fenced" from the ordinary activity of operating an airline. I have no doubt such treatment complies with all the appropriate accounting standards. But that doesn't make it feel 'right'. The second was the somewhat arbitrary (in timing) revaluation of Auckland International Airports assets. It kind of wrecks any ROE performance figures and I am still unclear as to why they had to do it. I await other peoples comment on the article with interest. SNOOPY --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "You can tell me I'm wrong twice, but that still only makes me wrong once." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
References
|