|
Printable version |
From: | "Christian Mair" <product@adidas-ep.co.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:30:48 +1300 |
I hit the 'send' button to quickly. Imagine if e.g. TEL was expected to earn $750m but only managed $735m. Not a huge difference and still a profit but the forecast has been missed and the shareprice is likely to dive. However, if AMZN forecasts a loss for $10m but manages only to loose $8m in a quarter the shareprice is likely to hike. -----Original Message----- From: sharechat-owner@sharechat.co.nz [mailto:sharechat-owner@sharechat.co.nz]On Behalf Of Jeremy Sent: Tuesday, 22 January 2002 2:21 p.m. To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz Subject: [sharechat] CAH poor result Why does CAH get an 8 cent boost in share price when it reports a $6 million operating profit in the 9 months to December as compared to $237 million in the corresponding period the previous year? Is it some sort of reward by the sharemarket for not actually making a loss? In the good old days, a company share price rose with a profit increase because it was making more money to pay dividends. Now it seems it rises becase its 'not doing as badly as it could be' These New Zealanders are crazy! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
Replies
References
|