|
Printable version |
From: | "G Stolwyk" <stolwyk@wave.co.nz> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Dec 2001 18:05:20 +1300 |
Introduction: Date: 13 Dec. 2001. The three
participants from the "Irreverent series" have decided to hold a
brainstorming session on current prospects of the US sharemarket.
Messrs. "H" and "G" are having drinks while
waiting for Dr Crash (C) to arrive.
H: You are late C, what
happened?
C: My name created a stampede at the
Ministry: the building was full of people when a colleague in a
waiting room on the top floor could'nt reach me and shouted from a distance: "
CRAAAASSSSHHHHHH".
Within seconds, the floors were vacated.
Staff rushed into their offices to place sell orders with their brokers.
People pushed each other down the stairs and they were joined by others who
followed in lemming-like fashion. They were trying to get to the nearest phone.
Others used their mobile.
I was held up in the melee and hence, I am
late!
H: We are here to discuss the US equity market.
I propose that you and I discuss the
positives and negatives and let G
to do the introduction and summing up.
G: Our thanks to Winner
69 who introduced the subject in:
and that site includes:
It discusses predictions from Warren
Buffett.
Peter Maiden also mentioned a
site; it refers to a book by Michael Alexander:
We are aware that the US is the world's
economic engine and we want to know its current health and
prospects:
1. The economic
situation outside the US.
H: Previous forecasts were far
too optimistic and the nations' prospective GDP data have been
slashed. In Europe, the UK is now to have a GDP growth of 1.4% in
2002.
Germany, which is Europe's economic
engine, has close to zero growth. The rest of Europe does not look
good, apart from Russia which is showing growth from a low base.
There is contraction and deflation in Japan.The
situation is rough in Asia except for China. This
country relies on deficit financing and has a reasonable GDP, considering
that US demand is down.
C: Oil is at present about $US18/barrel
and once the US economy recovers, one can expect higher
pricing.
Commodities: Aluminium: US 60 cents; copper:
US 66 cents and nickel $ US 2.22. Metals have declined
overnight.
At the same time 10 year US bonds have seen their
yields overnight lowered to 4.97%.
That could be the first indication that the US
stockmarket recovery of some 20% since the WTC attack, is
stalling.
G: Summing up, it is clear that
the US cannot expect help from other countries. The problem in Argentina won't
go away, either.
2. The economic situation in
the US.
G: I want to refer to a few constraints on the US
economy:
2.1 Corporate and Household
debt.
H: As I see it, there are the continuing effects
not only from the Dotcom collapse but also from lowered expectations since
the Sept. 2001 attack on the WTC: the gestation period of these two events will
be a long one.
During the Dotcom boom there were enormous debts
incurred in the above mentioned categories:
There was heavy corporate over
investment while investors mortgaged their homes and bought more
shares. Others bought homes at inflated prices and mortgaged
these, believing that the good times would last forever.
The spending on investment and consumption was much
higher than was earned. After the Dotcom collapse, cashflow became a
problem as the value of assets fell. Property was sold at a
loss. Refinancing lower valued property caused problems.
Greenspan then lowered interest rates and
after the Presidential election, efforts were made to stimulate the
economy by tax cuts. It was hoped that
the US consumer would keep on spending. ( It is about 2/3 of the GDP
).
C: The outcome of the attack on the WTC
aggravated the situation. The flow-on effects were massive in the
Airline, tourism and related industries and unemployment is
rising.
To improve the cash flow, use was made of foreign
money inflows. However, the Current Account Deficit was lowered from 4.5% of GDP
to the present 3.7%. To restore households
to normal debt levels, they still
need to undertake
another 67% of
the adjustment process. ( One
third completed so far- AMB-AMRO ).
G: Summing up, Corporates and
Households are keen to reduce debt levels. Businesses were sold to foreigners
and inventories were slashed. There were heavy
discounts including those in the pre-Christmas trade. And this
brings us to:
2.2 Deficit Financing and the Money
Supply.
H: To stimulate the markets and to promote
consumption, Greenspan has again lowered interest rates ( to 1.75% ).
Unfortunately, the consumer wants to pay off more debt and much of the tax cuts
does not finish up in the shops. Banks also tend to be more selective with
granting of loans.
Discounts granted to consumers result in lower
margins and less tax take. It is my
understanding that the tax cuts were based on a normal year of consumption and
profits.
Clearly, that is not going to be the case and there
are additional items : The cost of the war in Afghanistan,
its aftermath and possibly, other adventures to come. There will be a deficit, but the extent thereof is not yet
known.
C: Reports say that there is a significant
increase in the money supply. We are waiting for more
data.
G: Overall summary: the two
negatives mentioned in (2.2) could normally produce some inflation.
However, due to less demand, we expect deflation. Lower
profits and lower shareprices are likely to prevail. There are different P/E's being quoted but many accept that
they are still too high anyway!
Greenspan supplied the fuel ( liquidity)
to initially fire up the market after the Sept. attack on the
WTC. These stimulants ( tax cuts, cuts in
interest rates) will help but do not quickly remove the underlying
explained problems of the US.
Manufacturing continues to contract
sharply and is now at least at a twenty year's low. We expect a strong
increase in unemployment with a curb on the growth of wages. Data to come
in the next two months will be crucial.
It will take time to correct long standing
imbalances and to bring the economy back to some sort of
equilibrium. We feel that economic forecasts continue to be too
optimistic.
There are other issues, eg. treatment of US
accounting rules ( including goodwill) and a - much later - possible
reaction to the increased supply of money and
deficit financing. We won't discuss these at this stage.
2.3 Predictions given in above
mentioned web sites.
H: It was said
that there may not be much change in the S&P 500 in the next 15 to 20
years! I feel that comparisons are difficult to make as the flow of information,
the speed of transactions, the formation and expansion of the EEC, the
globalisation as well as co-operation between the world's major
financial institutions can be crucial and often, positive
factors.
C: We have already mentioned that in our
opinion, the US P/E's could be lowered. Much can happen in such a
long time. There will be corrections, sharp uptrends and down
trends. At the end of trading on Dec.12, the S&P was 1137, the Dow on
9895 and the Nasdaq was on 2011.
Those are our opinions,
Gerry
|
|